0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:25:39 EDT 2024
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.22/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.22/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uM6Ec8ebAB/E---3.1_16672.p
0.22/0.50	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.22/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.22/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.22/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 900s (5) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# new_bool_9 with pid 16756 completed with status 0
0.22/0.50	# Result found by new_bool_9
0.22/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.22/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.22/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 900s (5) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.22/0.50	# Search class: HUUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
0.22/0.50	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.22/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# new_ho_10 with pid 16758 completed with status 0
0.22/0.50	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.22/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.22/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.22/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 900s (5) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.22/0.50	# Search class: HUUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
0.22/0.50	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.22/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores
0.22/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.22/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.22/0.50	
0.22/0.50	# Proof found!
0.22/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.22/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.22/0.50	thf(decl_22, type, r: $i > $i > $o).
0.22/0.50	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_1: $i > $i).
0.22/0.50	thf(decl_24, type, esk2_1: ($i > $i) > $i).
0.22/0.50	thf(descr2, conjecture, (![X1:$i]:(?[X2:$i]:(((r @ X1)=(^[X3:$i]:(((X2)=(X3)))))))=>?[X4:$i > $i]:(![X1:$i]:((r @ X1 @ (X4 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uM6Ec8ebAB/E---3.1_16672.p', descr2)).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:$i]:(?[X2:$i]:(((r @ X1)=($eq @ X2))))=>?[X4:$i > $i]:(![X1:$i]:((r @ X1 @ (X4 @ X1)))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[descr2])])])).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X9:$i, X11:$i > $i]:((((r @ X9)=($eq @ (esk1_1 @ X9)))&~(r @ (esk2_1 @ X11) @ (X11 @ (esk2_1 @ X11))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((r @ X1)=($eq @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X13:$i]:((((esk1_1 @ X1)=(X13))<=>(r @ X1 @ X13))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i > $i]:(~((r @ (esk2_1 @ X4) @ (X4 @ (esk2_1 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((r @ X1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
0.22/0.50	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), ['proof']).
0.22/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.22/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.22/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.22/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 2
0.22/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.22/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.22/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 7
0.22/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.22/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.22/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 7
0.22/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.22/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.22/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.22/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.22/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 5
0.22/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
0.22/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.22/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.22/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.22/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.22/0.50	# NegExts                              : 0
0.22/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.22/0.50	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.22/0.50	# Total rewrite steps                  : 0
0.22/0.50	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.22/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.22/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.22/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.22/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.22/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.22/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 4
0.22/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.22/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.22/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.22/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.22/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.22/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.22/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.22/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 3
0.22/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.22/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.22/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.22/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.22/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.22/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.22/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.22/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 7
0.22/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.22/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 276
0.22/0.50	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 68
0.22/0.50	
0.22/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.50	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.22/0.50	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.22/0.50	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.22/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
0.22/0.50	
0.22/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.50	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.22/0.50	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.22/0.50	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.22/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.22/0.50	% E---3.1 exiting
0.22/0.51	% E exiting
0.22/0.51	EOF